W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > January to March 2010

Re: SV: Color coding

From: Richard Warren <richard@userite.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 14:49:24 -0000
Message-ID: <002101cab3ce$48ae5560$0302a8c0@richard>
To: "WAI Interest Group" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
I agree with Greg that pop-ups would drive most pople crazy.

Links should be self-explanatory. By default we expect any links to take us to another section of the current website, so it is only links that take us off the current site, or to non-html documents, that need special treatment. 

Ideally the link text itself should explain this. For example a link to "John Smith" should take me to a page on the current site about John Smith, whereas a link to "John Smith's Blog" would take me off the current site to his blog. Similarly a link to "Newsletter PDF" ( or better "Newsletter PDF  1.2MB") tells me exactly what to expect when I list the links on the page with my screenreader.

Colour coding is useless to a blind person and confusing to a sighted novice. Little icons (with alt tags) might help - so long as they are included in the actual link, but I am not sure that this works well for all screen readers. A little bit of extra care in wording link text is the best option all round as it helps everyone (including sighted users in a hurry) and improves search results.

Received on Monday, 22 February 2010 14:48:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:21:40 UTC