W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > October to December 2009

Re: Extra HTML attributes

From: Mag Leahy <magleahy@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 12:25:49 +0100
Message-ID: <a25bda170910060425h34f5427dg289529b3d6bdbcb9@mail.gmail.com>
To: Andy Laws <adlaws@gmail.com>
Cc: WAI Interest Group list <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Hello Andy,

If you use the W3C html validator you can be self sufficient on finding this
out yourself: http://validator.w3.org/

The results are:


   1. Value of attribute "id" invalid: "6" cannot start an id, must be
   letter
   2. Attribute "agdFormPrompt" is not a valid attribute
   3. Attribute "agdFormValidator" is not a valid attribute

All the best.


On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Andy Laws <adlaws@gmail.com> wrote:

> Dear All
> Recently i posted  an item on why the following line of code was bad
> practice
>
>
> <Select  id="660fb69a3e844a8bb89065b824a9b6d6"
> name="660fb69a3e844a8bb89065b824a9b6d6" agdFormPrompt="Workers"
> agdFormValidator="M-CHL">
>
> However i have lost the responses, i would be very greatfull if people
> could give the opinion on why this is bad practice,
>
> And what the resutls would be with a screen reader
>
> also Mozzila refuses to process the agdFormPrompt and agdFormValidator tags
>
>
> Many Regards and thank you in advance
>
> this has got very serious as i have lost my job because my boss did not
> belive what i was telling him
>
> Andrew laws
>
> --
> Andrew Laws Bsc(Hons) MBCS, FBCS
> Web-Sites:
> www.opelnet.co.uk
> www.cubiks.com
> www.holidayhypermarket.co.uk
> e-mail: adlaws@gmail.com
> Telephone:: +44 (0) 7828822987
>



-- 
Mag
Received on Tuesday, 6 October 2009 11:26:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:14:33 GMT