W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > July to September 2009

Re: Htacces and WCAG 2

From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 15:33:42 +0100
Message-ID: <4A82D2C6.4000703@splintered.co.uk>
To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis wrote:

> Is it your intention to ask the same formula question ("Does X conflict 
> with WCAG 2.0?") of this Interest Group for every single design decision 
> your company makes with this website, or do have special reason to think 
> that blocking by IP or referrer would reduce the accessibility of your 
> website to people with disabilities?

To expand on that (and at the risk of being uncharacteristically rude), 
this list is not a WCAG helpline. If you have some very specific 
concerns because, even after best efforts on your part, you're having 
difficulty understanding how a Success Criterion or a non-normative, 
suggested technique might affect a very specific aspect of your site, 
then people here are glad to give their opinion (again, mostly 
non-normative). Otherwise, may I humbly suggest that you get an external 
consultant who specialises in WCAG 2.0 audits/assessments to help you?

P
-- 
Patrick H. Lauke
______________________________________________________________
re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]

www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
http://redux.deviantart.com | http://flickr.com/photos/redux/
______________________________________________________________
Co-lead, Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force
http://webstandards.org/
______________________________________________________________
Received on Wednesday, 12 August 2009 14:34:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:14:32 GMT