W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > July to September 2009


From: Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <bhawkeslewis@googlemail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 08:11:18 +0100
Message-ID: <4A826B16.1060805@googlemail.com>
To: W Reagan <wreagan1@yahoo.com>
CC: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org, gv@trace.wisc.edu
On 12/08/2009 03:01, W Reagan wrote:
> I recerntly got a consultants opinion: I highlited important information
> where they think it would pass or fail.


> Which scenarios does the WAI Working Group agree with. Please specify by
> Q1, Q2, Q3, or Q4.

There are multiple WAI Working Groups. This list /isn't/ a WAI Working 
Group (as I've pointed out to you multiple times now), it's an Interest 
Group and the replies of individual subscribers do not represent the 
Group as a whole.

My personal opinion is that all four of the consultant's answers seem 
roughly in line with my own interpretation of the WCAG 2.0 
Recommendation (http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/).

Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
Received on Wednesday, 12 August 2009 07:11:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:21:39 UTC