- From: Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <bhawkeslewis@googlemail.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 08:11:18 +0100
- To: W Reagan <wreagan1@yahoo.com>
- CC: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org, gv@trace.wisc.edu
On 12/08/2009 03:01, W Reagan wrote: > I recerntly got a consultants opinion: I highlited important information > where they think it would pass or fail. [snip] > Which scenarios does the WAI Working Group agree with. Please specify by > Q1, Q2, Q3, or Q4. There are multiple WAI Working Groups. This list /isn't/ a WAI Working Group (as I've pointed out to you multiple times now), it's an Interest Group and the replies of individual subscribers do not represent the Group as a whole. My personal opinion is that all four of the consultant's answers seem roughly in line with my own interpretation of the WCAG 2.0 Recommendation (http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/). -- Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
Received on Wednesday, 12 August 2009 07:11:59 UTC