I recently saw on the forum the following opinions: 1) If a visited site already complied with 2.4.4 do I need to comply? There response is that "I have not obligation under WCAG 2.0 to ensure that where I link to is accessible." If I have link to a downlodable document that was split into multiple documents: 2) Link to the page providing the PDF's. It is more benefical if the page already provides the format and/or other offers downloads in other formats. It is also more benefical when a document comes out with a new release, rather than linking to the same PDF document, leaving my visitors with a broken link. 3) Can I link to HTML/text version and ignore file type and file size? Their response is "Yes". Does WCAG/WAI Working Group agree with any of these opinions that have been obtained from an independent source?Received on Tuesday, 11 August 2009 18:19:45 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 11 August 2009 18:19:47 GMT