W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > July to September 2009

Re: Bypass Blocks (2.4.1)

From: N Maffeo <maffeonjr@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 02:40:50 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <448321.78809.qm@web111910.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org, David Dorward <david@dorward.me.uk>
You made a referral to the context of the site. What should we check in context to determine if a specific technique is sufficient to verify Bypass Blocks?
 
When the company checks the context of site (as you indirectly suggest) for Bypass Blocks what should we look for to determine what rules are required (G1,G123, G123, H69, AND H50)? SCR28, H64, AND H70 are not needed. We do not use frames or scripts.
 
--- On Sun, 8/9/09, David Dorward <david@dorward.me.uk> wrote:


From: David Dorward <david@dorward.me.uk>
Subject: Re: Bypass Blocks (2.4.1)
To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Date: Sunday, August 9, 2009, 8:09 AM



On 9 Aug 2009, at 09:04, N Maffeo wrote:

> That does not answer the original question.
> 
> Will one of the seven techniques be sufficient?
> 

Maybe. Maybe not. It depends on context. Don't get hung up on the techniques. Test against the criteria.


--David Dorward
http://dorward.me.uk
Received on Sunday, 9 August 2009 09:43:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:14:32 GMT