W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > July to September 2009

Re: Bypass Blocks (2.4.1)

From: N Maffeo <maffeonjr@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 01:04:38 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <403805.11610.qm@web111902.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org, David Dorward <david@dorward.me.uk>
That does not answer the original question. 
Will one of the seven techniques be sufficient?
Will it require one technique from part 1 and one technique from part 2?
I pasted it in my first e-mail to w3.org.

--- On Sun, 8/9/09, David Dorward <david@dorward.me.uk> wrote:

From: David Dorward <david@dorward.me.uk>
Subject: Re: Bypass Blocks (2.4.1)
To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Date: Sunday, August 9, 2009, 7:49 AM

On 9 Aug 2009, at 08:41, N Maffeo wrote:

> What do you mean "You meet the criteria by meeting the criteria"? What is sufficient enough for 2.4.1?

You meet 2.4.1 if there is a mechanism to bypass blocks of content that are repeated on multiple pages.

--David Dorward

Received on Sunday, 9 August 2009 08:05:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:21:39 UTC