W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > July to September 2009

Re: 2.4.4 Sample

From: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2009 22:16:32 +0100
Message-ID: <4A7B4830.1080303@david-woolley.me.uk>
To: Chris Reeve <chrisreeve15@yahoo.com>
CC: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Chris Reeve wrote:
> Can somebody make a recommendation to WCAG 2 that it should be the 
> responsibility of the developer's site that maintains downlodable file, 
> or one of the two sites (my site or the developers site)?
> 
> 
Even if it weren't past cut off for comments, I don't think that anyone 
but you has a problem with the intent that it is the responsibility of 
the author of the link (i.e. you).

-- 
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
Received on Thursday, 6 August 2009 21:17:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:14:32 GMT