W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > January to March 2009

Re: accessibility supported questions

From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 13:18:08 -0500
Cc: Ramón Corominas <listas@ramoncorominas.com>, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Message-Id: <87213CE7-E566-4B41-88E1-8E6F64C63A9C@trace.wisc.edu>
To: "Accessys@smart.net" <accessys@smart.net>

On Mar 31, 2009, at 8:57 AM, Accessys@smart.net wrote:

> the key part of at least USA law is that it cannot be considered
> accessible or compliant if it requires a person with a disability to
> have a specific piece of equipment or software that is not required of
> everyone or is not provided free to everyone who needs it.

I'm not sure this is correct.

A cell phone is considered conforming to US access laws if (among  
other things) it works with hearing aids  - but hearing aids are not  
provided to everyone for free.

This is a huge problem though (access that requires software that  
everyone cannot afford).  We are launching an effort to address  
this.   More in a bit.

Gregg Vanderheiden Ph.D.
Director Trace R&D Center
Professor Ind and Biomed Engr
University of Wisconsin-Madison
Received on Tuesday, 31 March 2009 18:19:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:21:39 UTC