sounds about in line with my experiences with Federal websites Bob On Thu, 4 Sep 2008, William R Williams wrote: > The law in the USA is called Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act (29 > U.S.C. 794d), as amended by the Workforce Investment Act of 1998 (P.L. > 105-220), August 7, 1998. It's scope is limited to Federal Departments and > Agencies. There are no real enforcement mechanisms. Only an "individual > with a disability may file a complaint alleging that a Federal department > or agency fails to comply" with the law. > > The Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) requires agencies to acquire > accessible electronic and information unless an exception applies and is > documented. Across all agencies, an assessment in late-2007 showed that > only 3% of the solicitations that included electronic and information > technology properly included the Section 508 standards. > > Bill Williams > > > > > David Woolley > <forums@david-woo > lley.me.uk> To > Sent by: Joachim Andersson > w3c-wai-ig-reques <joachim.andersson@etu.se> > t@w3.org cc > "Accessys@smart.net" > <accessys@smart.net>, Harry Loots > 09/04/2008 02:36 <harry.loots@ieee.org>, James Craig > PM <jcraig@apple.com>, John Foliot > <foliot@wats.ca>, wai-ig list > <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>, > "wai-xtech@w3.org WAI-XTECH" > <wai-xtech@w3.org>, > webaim-forum@list.webaim.org > Subject > Re: OFF TOPIC - Shame on Google > > > > > > > > > > > > Joachim Andersson wrote: > > If someone hit me in the face I would think twice about making an effort > > to help him, wouldn't you? I'm from Sweden. The country where everyone's > > complaining, noone's doing anything about things and the complaints > > lining up. > > > > In my line of work I meet many people with disabilities of all kinds, > > who are very competent and they're doing a great job working with web > > accessibility and solutions to help others. But these people are those > > that don't march and such. They have found other, more effective ways of > > reaching their goals. > > > > I realize the importance of marching and so on, but 1975 is another time > > than 2008. In Sweden, Canada and the United States there are laws on how > > accessibility should be a part of development. In Canada and the United > > Are they enforced? In the UK such laws exist but are not enforced. > Even where companies have policies, when it actually comes to buying, > the supplier and buyer often find ways to get round them. The same goes > for electromagnetic compatibility, a subject dear to the heart of > another minority, amateur radio operators. > > > > -- > David Woolley > Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want. > RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam, > that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work. > > > - end ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ occasionally a true patriot must defend his country from its' government +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve Neither liberty nor safety", Benjamin Franklin - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ASCII Ribbon Campaign. . . . . . . . . . . . accessBob .NO HTML/PDF/RTF/MIME in e-mail. . . . . . . accessys@smartnospam.net .NO MSWord docs in e-mail . . . .. . . . . . Access Systems, engineers .NO attachments in e-mail, .*LINUX powered*. access is a civil right *#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*# THIS message and any attachments are CONFIDENTIAL and may be privileged. They are intended ONLY for the individual or entity namedReceived on Thursday, 4 September 2008 22:27:51 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:49:56 GMT