W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > July to September 2008

Re: WCAG2 Conformance Questions

From: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 23:04:47 +0100
Message-ID: <48ADE67F.9050504@david-woolley.me.uk>
To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org

Ryan Jean wrote:
> 

> 
> Usually when I see printer friendly links, it results in a pop-up. If I 

In my experience the need for a printer friendly page indicates that the 
original page is not accessible, or at least, that the designer doesn't 
understand CSS.  I would suggest that most accessible pages only need 
@media to print properly using the basic browser print functionality.

Some specific reasons why people might want an explicit printer friendly 
page are:

- open source browsers could be tweaked to give a printer like handling 
on display media, resulting in the suppression of advertising 
(advertising is commonly removed in the printer friendly version).  In 
that case, there may be a static printer friendly version, but it won't 
be shown to search engines;

- there seems to be a big psychological need amongst designers to turn 
their documents into mini web browsers and eliminate the standard 
browser controls.

> were to have it link like that, the content would have to be duplicated 
> on a separate page, which I donít want to do. Do you know server-side 
> scripting that will hide the content of the other cells? And not only 
> that, but make them act like they arenít even there?

-- 
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
Received on Thursday, 21 August 2008 22:04:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:14:28 GMT