W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > April to June 2008

RE: comparing WCAG 1.0 and WCAG 2.0

From: Patrick Lauke <P.H.Lauke@salford.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 10:42:01 +0100
Message-ID: <1DF9B976DE799440A3286F367E24277311D00A@ISD-EXV03.isdads.salford.ac.uk>
To: "Roger Hudson" <rhudson@usability.com.au>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>

> Roger Hudson

> I have prepared a document which I hope will help people
> who are familiar with WCAG 1.0 to transfer the current
> knowledge and practices across to WCAG 2.0. For example in
> WCAG 1.0, Checkpoint 3.5 requires header elements to be
> used correctly. Where is the similar requirement in WCAG 2.0?
> Answer; Success Criteria 1.3.1 (Info and relationships),
> Technique H42: "Using h1-h6 to identify headings" (and
> there is a link to the technique page). 
>
>Comparing WCAG 1.0 and 2.0 is at http://wipa.org.au/papers/wcag-migration.htm 

Hi Roger,

great stuff. I'll look over it in more detail, but from my
first skim over it looks very comprehensive.

One little thing that may be worth mentioning/stressing in
the document is the fact that all techniques are only
*informative*, and also that the techniques document is not
meant to be an exhaustive list (i.e. there's scope to come
up with many more solutions for a particular technology
which still address the actual SC, but aren't listed in the
tech document itself).

P
________________________________
Patrick H. Lauke
Web Editor
Enterprise & Development
University of Salford
Room 113, Faraday House
Salford, Greater Manchester
M5 4WT
UK

T +44 (0) 161 295 4779
webmaster@salford.ac.uk

www.salford.ac.uk

A GREATER MANCHESTER UNIVERSITY  
Received on Monday, 2 June 2008 09:41:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:14:27 GMT