W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > January to March 2007

Re: WCAG 1.0 Question

From: Andy Mabbett <andy@pigsonthewing.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 21:45:29 +0000
Message-ID: <nkXjg5u53QwFFwII@pigsonthewing.org.uk>
To: "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk>
Cc: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org

In message <20070131114231.kvdgy7q65skc4o4o@www.splintered.co.uk>,
Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk> writes

>
>Quoting Andy Mabbett <andy@pigsonthewing.org.uk>:
>
>> Even if it did not apply to Flash, how would having device-dependent
>> event handlers for Flash content be accessible?
>
>It would be more accessible than *not* having them, surely?

In as much as a page with no content is more accessible than one with
bad markup, yes.

But that's hardy the point.

Anyway, shouldn't you be looking into eGMS? ;-)

-- 
Andy Mabbett
            *  Say "NO!" to compulsory ID Cards:  <http://www.no2id.net/>
            *  Free Our Data:  <http://www.freeourdata.org.uk>
            *  Are you using Microformats, yet: <http://microformats.org/> ?
Received on Wednesday, 31 January 2007 21:47:15 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:14:26 GMT