- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 22:53:37 +0000
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
- CC: gawds_discuss@yahoogroups.com
John Foliot wrote: > My concern (and theirs), the issue, is a visual clutter... If I need to echo > back the same "private" icon (currently a "lock") 20 times it will become a > visual overload - I can't get buy in here. Bold text however does stand out > without the same visual noise. How do I convey this distinction in a > non-visual way is the conundrum. Hide the additional "private" bit via CSS. If it were a table, hide the entire column (or rather, every TD from that column and the associated TH). In your case, why not just stick a <span>(private)</span> in there and have CSS that hides (off screen left, not display:none) any span inside a dd.private? P -- Patrick H. Lauke __________________________________________________________ re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively [latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.] www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk http://redux.deviantart.com __________________________________________________________ Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force http://webstandards.org/ __________________________________________________________
Received on Monday, 20 November 2006 22:53:42 UTC