W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > October to December 2006

Re: Breadcrumbs

From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2006 20:46:29 +0000
Message-ID: <454F9F25.6040904@splintered.co.uk>
To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org

Eadie, David wrote:

> Personally, I view a breadcrumb trail as being, semantically,
> hierarchical; which suggests to me that it should be marked up as a
> nested list.

Then again, I've always looked at breadcrumbs as an ordered list of 
steps: how to get from the homepage to this page in the shortest 
possible way. That's why, on some recent sites I've done, I've started 
using a simple OL. It all depends on how you look at it.

P
-- 
Patrick H. Lauke
__________________________________________________________
re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]
www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
http://redux.deviantart.com
__________________________________________________________
Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force
http://webstandards.org/
__________________________________________________________
Received on Monday, 6 November 2006 20:46:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 5 February 2014 07:13:31 UTC