W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > January to March 2006

RE: Fwd: Call for Review: Working Draft of Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0

From: Web Usability Roger Hudson <rhudson@usability.com.au>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 08:28:42 +1100
To: "Charles McCathieNevile" <chaals@opera.com>, "WAI Interest Group" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <GGEEINFOLDEIIBPBECEMCELICGAA.rhudson@usability.com.au>

Like Charles, I am waiting for a response to a bunch of comments. 
I must say the lack of any direct response after three months rather surprises me and makes me wonder if the request for comments and input from the wider accessibility community was genuine.

Take care
Roger

-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org]On
Behalf Of Charles McCathieNevile
Sent: Tuesday, 21 March 2006 4:00 AM
To: WAI Interest Group
Subject: Re: Fwd: Call for Review: Working Draft of Web Content
Accessibility Guidelines 2.0



On Tue, 20 Dec 2005 06:04:22 +0100, Judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org> wrote:

> This is a reminder that review comments are due by Wednesday, 21  
> December, on the 23 November 2005 Web Content Accessibility Guidelines  
> 2.0 Working Draft and supporting documents.

I worked hard to send in a bunch of comments, but have never heard  
anything except an auto-responder that they are logged and will be added  
to the issues list. Has anyone else got a direct response, or am I  
expected to search myself for the issues?

cheers

Chaals

-- 
Charles McCathieNevile                     chaals@opera.com
   hablo español  -  je parle français  -  jeg lærer norsk
      Peek into the kitchen: http://snapshot.opera.com/
Received on Monday, 20 March 2006 21:29:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:14:24 GMT