On Mon, 27 Feb 2006, Cynthia Waddell wrote: > Hello- > >From the U.S. legal analysis point of view, both the ADA and Section 504 are > "informed" by the Section 508 Electronic and Information Technology thanks that was the phrase I was looking for. I'm an engineer not a lawyer. > -------------------------------------- > Cynthia D. Waddell, JD which you obviously ^^^ are Bob > > > Bob said: > > "... and to > > determine what is appropriate compliance it turns to the ATBCB for > > guidance and they reference back to section 508 and W3C/WAI level 3" > > > > Can you provide a specific URL web reference where is says or implies > > this? > > no. but if someone is sued for non compliance for access to a site based > on 504 or ADA where do you think they go to for guidance.??? > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ CONFIGURE YOUR E-MAIL TO SEND TEXT ONLY, see http://expita.com/nomime.html +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve Neither liberty nor safety", Benjamin Franklin - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ASCII Ribbon Campaign accessBob NO HTML/PDF/RTF in e-mail accessys@smartnospam.net NO MSWord docs in e-mail Access Systems, engineers NO attachments in e-mail, *LINUX powered* access is a civil right *#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*# THIS message and any attachments are CONFIDENTIAL and may be privileged. They are intended ONLY for the individual or entity named
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:49:50 GMT