Martin Stehle wrote: > In english: The way is to avoid letters because of the problems many > articels wrote about. Instead one could use numbers. Martin, While it is true that using numeric keys introduces *minimal* issues, some access problems do remain, especially with #'s 5, 8 and 9: Please see the chart at http://www.wats.ca/resources/accesskeysandkeystrokes/38 Remember too that WindowEyes is configured to allow the end user to pre-map the numeric keys (on Windows platform Alt+1 through 0) for "User-defined windows". A better solution (if you continue to believe that you *really* need accesskeys) would be to investigate one of the new crop of scripts that are surfacing, that allow the end user to specify *their* preference. See: http://golem.ph.utexas.edu/~distler/blog/archives/000723.html http://juicystudio.com/article/user-defined-accesskeys.php (plus more at Gez's site) http://www.tjkdesign.com/articles/user_defined_accesskeys.asp JF -- John Foliot foliot@wats.ca Web Accessibility Specialist / Co-founder of WATS.ca Web Accessibility Testing and Services http://www.wats.ca Phone: 1-613-482-7053Received on Sunday, 29 January 2006 00:59:15 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:14:24 GMT