W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > January to March 2006

Re: Colour contrast on logos

From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 11:37:56 +0100
To: "Robert Walpole" <robert.walpole@devon.gov.uk>, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.s3kk5iutwxe0ny@widsith.local>

On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 09:42:42 +0100, Robert Walpole  
<robert.walpole@devon.gov.uk> wrote:

> The logo is basically some text in
> a pale green on a white background - not a sufficient contrast for text
> by any measure but as this is a logo does it matter? I can add title and
> alt attributes to the image but is this sufficient for compliance
> purposes or should we really go back to the designer and request a more
> accessible logo?

The point about contrast is enabling people to see things. If the logo is  
textual, but too low contrast to read, the odds are that it is too low  
contrast to be recognisable in any case, which means it isn't doing its  
job as a logo. (Note that contrast is higher priority for images than for  
text, since in principle you can more easily change it for text).

So yes, I would be going back to the designer, pointing out that  
recognition by everyone is a requirement for the design and low contrast  
washouts aren't going to meet that requirement...

(This is based on my imagining the design, which is of course not  
reliable. Please check my arguments with your perception of reality. Your  
mileage may vary :)

cheers

Chaals

-- 
Charles McCathieNevile                     chaals@opera.com
   hablo español  -  je parle français  -  jeg lærer norsk
      Peek into the kitchen: http://snapshot.opera.com/
Received on Wednesday, 18 January 2006 10:38:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:14:24 GMT