W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > January to March 2006

RE: Accesskey Re: <span> within a word any issue for screen readers?

From: John Foliot - WATS.ca <foliot@wats.ca>
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 23:55:20 -0500
To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <02c301c615a2$14cc33d0$6501a8c0@bosshog>

Geoff Deering wrote:
> Yes, where's John?  Is he on holidays?  Surely he has a bot to alert 
> him to this discussion:-)

Even John has bills to pay - I shut down the 'ol email client today to
avoid distractions... Like this one <smile>, and get some work done.
Beside Geoff, according to you I've now progressed to a principle... I
don't even need to be in the discussion to have my ghost linger on...
<huge grin>

> 
> So I think user agents need to provide this level of user 
> configuration, and I guess the same applies to keyboard binding via 
> hypertext applications.

Which is why I am still in battle with the HTML Editors who somehow feel
that allowing the author to bind a specific key to an @role entity is
acceptable.  I continue to maintain that all the author need do is
declare the intent, and leave the binding to the end user, and/or their
software.

Elsewhere....

I come late to this discussion, and from what I can tell the accesskey
debate has been beaten down (thanks to the crew).  Which then leaves but
one question, why is the author underlining simply one letter within a
word?  If you remove the need for visually rendering a hint to an
accesskey that may or may not be broken, what other reason exists for
this type of coding behavior?  And more to the point, if it is simply a
visual rendering, how is this "important" information being delivered to
non-visual user-agents?  I realize that these questions have surfaced
already, but I take it back to the beginning - why do you need to
support this behavior anyway?

JF
--
John Foliot  foliot@wats.ca
Web Accessibility Specialist / Co-founder of WATS.ca
Web Accessibility Testing and Services
http://www.wats.ca   
Phone: 1-613-482-7053  
Received on Tuesday, 10 January 2006 04:55:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:14:24 GMT