W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > April to June 2006

RE: WCAG 2.0 Reflections - 3.4 equivelent?

From: Matthew Harris <mharris@morpheum.com.au>
Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 21:11:58 +1000
Message-Id: <200605171112.k4HBCfaA036135@smtp3.adl2.internode.on.net>
To: "'Alastair Campbell'" <ac@nomensa.com>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>

Hi everyone

To be honest, you have been talking about WCAG 2.0 for years now and how
about just getting it out so we can all improve our usability and
accessibility.

Regards

Matt Harris
An Aussie waiting in anticipation and stop the procrastination



-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org] On Behalf
Of Alastair Campbell
Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 7:41 PM
To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Subject: RE: WCAG 2.0 Reflections - 3.4 equivelent?


Hi everyone,

I'm not disagreeing with Wayne, but I've noticed that there doesn't seem
to be any advice on layout (in the HTML techniques for example).

This is why I ask:
http://www.accessifyforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=37960

Someone asked about WCAG v1 checkpoint 3.4, relative units, someone else
started talking about conformance (in v2) because I suggested that you
don't have to apply relative units to every element.

Is it just me not finding it, an omission, something to be added later,
or is it seen as out of scope?

Kind regards,

-Alastair

--
Alastair Campbell         |  Director of User Experience

Nomensa Email Disclaimer:
http://www.nomensa.com/email-disclaimer.html
Received on Wednesday, 17 May 2006 11:13:00 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:14:24 GMT