David Poehlman wrote: > I suggest that as long as there is braille, this problem will exist. I > suggest further that it never be religated to the end of days till *all* > issues with its removal are resolved lest we move backwards in > accessibility istead of forwards. I'd suggest that this issue is one that should be flagged up to the developers of braille software. Surely it should be possible to build in support to make the presence of empty inpts obvious to users? P -- Patrick H. Lauke __________________________________________________________ re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively [latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.] www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk http://redux.deviantart.com __________________________________________________________ Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force http://webstandards.org/ __________________________________________________________Received on Tuesday, 9 May 2006 01:51:21 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:49:50 GMT