W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > October to December 2005

RE: Best automated Accessibility evaluation tool

From: Julian Scarlett <Julian.Scarlett@eden.gov.uk>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 10:23:02 -0000
Message-ID: <9DC70EEAAFAE154AAA19F676DA93D12218F85D@EDENMAIL.eden.gov.uk>
To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>


There is no 'best' imho. They all have problems, see http://juicystudio.com/article/invalid-content-accessibility-validators.php - you'll have to use a combination of at least a couple and beware of false positives and missing negatives.

I would personally echo Patrick's views on TAW - nice and configurable. (Haven't yet tried it with Gez's tests in the above link.) Also, A-prompt and the trusted Tidy if you're working in a windows environment and want to test developmental work rather than live pages.


-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Paul Collins
Sent: 18 November 2005 10:43
To: WebAIM Discussion List; w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Subject: Best automated Accessibility evaluation tool

Looking at Accessibility evaluation software, could anyone recommend the best tool for all-round evaluation?

And yes, I will be doing human testing also!


Scanned by MessageLabs for EDC

This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
 Security System on behalf of Eden District Council . For more information on a proactive email security service working around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com
Received on Monday, 21 November 2005 10:24:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:21:33 UTC