W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > October to December 2005

RE: Accessibility for Deaf/Dumb

From: John Colby <John.Colby@uce.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 09:10:31 +0100
Message-ID: <294B4B3243E76C4BA4FF7F54003B3BE103743240@exchangea.staff.uce.ac.uk>
To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>

Moot point - depends on what is considered a 'reasonable adjustment'. My
take is that 'if you can see it you should also le able to hear it and
if you cam hear it you should also be able to read it' is a reasonable
adjustment. Overcomplicating things does not assist but obscures.

John

John Colby 
Lecturer, Department of Computing, The Business School,
Room F328a, Feeney Building, University of Central England,
Franchise Street, Perry Barr, Birmingham B42 2SU
Tel: +44 (0) 121 331 6937
Essential Website - http://essential.tbs.uce.ac.uk
-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Julian Voelcker
Sent: 06 October 2005 09:00
To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Subject: Accessibility for Deaf/Dumb


Morning All,

A client of ours has suggested putting some sign language images on 
their site that tells visitors to call a special phone line kitted out 
for braille based phones.

My gut feeling is that this is taking things too far and anybody that 
is deaf or dumb would be able to read normal text so the sign language 
would be unnecessary.

Am I wrong?

Any feedback would be appreciated.

Cheers,

Julian Voelcker
Cirencester, United Kingdom
Received on Thursday, 6 October 2005 08:12:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:14:23 GMT