W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > July to September 2005

Re: Exploding the myth of automated accessibility checking

From: Lisa Seeman <lisa@ubaccess.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2005 20:18:51 +0200
Message-ID: <42F8F38B.7040105@ubaccess.com>
To: Joe Clark <joeclark@joeclark.org>
CC: WAI-IG <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>, WAI-GL <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, Gez Lemon <gez.lemon@gmail.com>

> It's quite a devastating analysis and calls into question the WCAG 
> Working Group's interest in making as many guidelines as possible 
> machine-checkable.

Thank you Joe and Gez.

We also need to remember that Human testing is not always the same as 
user testing...

I was asking someone about the new working draft, and they asked me if 
the orentaion and focus pf WCAG has  changed the help the emphasis  was 
towards helping the designed at the expense of the perspective of  
disabled user . I am not saying I agree but I think we need to think 
about it.

Checklist type testability is really useful for the designer. User 
testing on the other hand focuses the user.

All the best
Received on Tuesday, 9 August 2005 18:34:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:21:32 UTC