W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > January to March 2005

Re: Copywriting for Screenreaders (was Alt text for URL's)

From: Tina Holmboe <tina@greytower.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 15:08:00 +0100 (CET)
Message-Id: <200502141408.j1EE80ZX026674@asterix.andreasen.se>
To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org

On 14 Feb, david poehlman wrote:

> I learn as I go.  It's good tat you can use css but suppose I decide I
> want to put it on tape. Never mind this road.  Anchors have been
> around longer than te wai and if judicious use of internal anchors is
> made, skip to anything is not needed.

  Indeed they have - which is why the controversy surrounding this issue
  confuses me.

  There is really no difference, in principle or in practice, between a
  "table of contents" link and a "main content" link. Both internal,
  both within the standards, both used exactly as internal links are
  meant to be used.

  Perfect.

  As for the need - yes, there will *always* be a need for internal
  anchors to skip between various sections of a document - UNLESS, of
  course, we decide to predefine a number of a types of sections a
  document can have. Sortof not the new-fangled XML-type method, that.


-- 
 -    Tina Holmboe                    Greytower Technologies
   tina@greytower.net                http://www.greytower.net/
   [+46] 0708 557 905
Received on Monday, 14 February 2005 14:45:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:14:19 GMT