W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > January to March 2005

Re: Copywriting for Screenreaders (was Alt text for URL's)

From: david poehlman <david.poehlman@handsontechnologeyes.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 08:54:32 -0500
Message-ID: <003501c5129c$b64e4c70$6401a8c0@DAVIDPC>
To: "Tina Holmboe" <tina@greytower.net>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>

I learn as I go.  It's good tat you can use css but suppose I decide I want 
to put it on tape. Never mind this road.  Anchors have been around longer 
than te wai and if judicious use of internal anchors is made, skip to 
anything is not needed.

Johnnie Apple Seed
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tina Holmboe" <tina@greytower.net>
To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2005 8:48 AM
Subject: Re: Copywriting for Screenreaders (was Alt text for URL's)



On 14 Feb, david poehlman wrote:

> No, It sure looks funny in print.

  What looks funny in print? A "skip" link looks no more funny than,
  say, a "table of contents" or "footnotes" link.

  Besides, this -is- one use to which we can put printer CSS. We do
  exactly that; as well as remove underline from other links. It helps.


  Or did I miss something here? Is accessibility really about what does
  and does not look funny in print?

-- 
 -    Tina Holmboe                    Greytower Technologies
   tina@greytower.net                http://www.greytower.net/
   [+46] 0708 557 905
Received on Monday, 14 February 2005 13:55:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:14:19 GMT