W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > January to March 2005

Re: accessible banking:

From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 03:19:53 +0000
Message-ID: <42019859.8060001@splintered.co.uk>
To: 'wai-ig list' <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>

Kelly Pierce wrote:
>  Because a blind computer user can successfully
> conduct transactions on a website with IE, they would consider that 
> effective communication and be little swayed by the arguments presented 
> here.  one does not have the right to sue for the communication method 
> of their choice, only for an effective means of independently sending 
> and receiving communications.

What if said user could demonstrate that she doesn't have Windows, hence 
no IE? Does the fact that the OS is available for purchase count towards 
making Win/IE an effective means?
Patrick H. Lauke
re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]
www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
Received on Thursday, 3 February 2005 03:18:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:21:30 UTC