W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > October to December 2004

Re: Image Galleries, Alt vs caption.

From: david poehlman <david.poehlman@handsontechnologeyes.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2004 08:10:23 -0500
Message-ID: <003a01c4dacb$c7c72570$6401a8c0@DAVIDPC>
To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>, "B.K. DeLong" <bkdelong@pobox.com>

caption and alt serve two different purposes, caption is more like title. 
alt is replacement.

Johnnie Apple Seed

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "B.K. DeLong" <bkdelong@pobox.com>
To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Sent: Saturday, December 04, 2004 9:25 PM
Subject: Image Galleries, Alt vs caption.



Hi all -

I thought I'd drop this by you all to see what you think. Perhaps I'm just
tired and overthinking the matter.

I'm producing an image gallery standard that I want to make accessible as
possible. In the past, we've used 4 column tables - 1 row for images and a
second row for captions. In theory, I could associate the caption cell with
the image cell it goes to but inherently, it's not a proper table data.

So I'm looking for a different option. Probably tables or an inline
unordered list.

I was thinking - is it overly redundant to have both an ALT attribute on an
image and a caption under the image? Most users will see the one caption.
But wouldn't a screenreader potentially read both? Is there a valid way to
associate a caption with an image? Is the table solution more logical in
this casE?

Thanks in advance.

--
B.K. DeLong
bkdelong@pobox.com
+1.617.797.2472

http://bkdelong.mit.edu                       Work.
http://www.brain-stream.com               Play.
http://www.the-leaky-cauldron.org        Potter.
http://www.city-of-doors.com               Sigil.
http://www.hackerfoundation.org          Future.
http://www.osvdb.org/                         Security.
http://www.wkdelong.org           Son.


PGP Fingerprint:
38D4 D4D4 5819 8667 DFD5  A62D AF61 15FF 297D 67FE

FOAF:
http://foaf.brain-stream.org
Received on Sunday, 5 December 2004 13:10:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:14:18 GMT