W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > July to September 2004

Including stuff Re: W3C Roadmap

From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@sidar.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 13:44:27 +0300
To: "David Woolley" <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Message-ID: <opsebewdeiw5l938@widsith.local>

I think there are more options than just GIF. It depends on what you are  
trying to do. More to the point, the question was about whether W3C (or  
anyone else) has a plan to get us where we would like to be in the future,  
not whether we can change the web to be what we want it tomorrow.

Cheers

Chaals

On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 21:09:13 +0100 (BST), David Woolley  
<david@djwhome.demon.co.uk> wrote:

>
>> grtaphics). The point of doing these things in XML was to work towards
>> being able to include them in each other. SVG got pretty close pretty
>> quickly with the foreignObject element [4], which could specify a  
>> required
>
> I would have been happy with inclusion by object or img, but the reality
> is that one must still use GIF.



-- 
Charles McCathieNevile         charles@sidar.org
FundaciĆ³n Sidar             http://www.sidar.org
Received on Tuesday, 14 September 2004 11:45:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 5 February 2014 23:39:44 UTC