W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > July to September 2004

Re: Does 5.1 absolutely require TH?

From: Alastair Campbell <ac@nomensa.com>
Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2004 18:27:08 +0100
Message-ID: <4139FAEC.5010806@nomensa.com>
To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org

Bailey, Bruce wrote:
> So, does 5.1 necessarily require the _addition_ of TH?

In terms of how it affects people, it would be a matter of
interpretation around this aspect:
Does the addition of the headers make the content easier to understand?
(In some cases it is more clear cut - it would be impossible to
understand without headers.)

I guess if it were an absolute rule (it's not, its a guideline), then
any data table should have headers. A data table is defined as:
"When tables are used to represent logical relationships among data --
text, numbers, images, etc., that information is called "tabular
information" and the tables are called 'data tables'."

Each row/column has a relationship (e.g. the last column is the state),
so I would say yes, it should have headers.

It's a judgment call, personally, I tend to side with maximum ease of 
use and would add the headers. I wouldn't make the assumption that 
everyone else will understand so easily.




Alastair Campbell   |   Director of Technology
0117 929 7333       |   ac@nomensa.com

Please refer to the following disclaimer for this message:
Received on Saturday, 4 September 2004 17:27:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:21:29 UTC