W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > July to September 2004

Re: Accessibility humanized

From: Alastair Campbell <ac@nomensa.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 13:05:44 +0100
Message-ID: <4129DD98.1010806@nomensa.com>
To: Andy Budd <andy@message.uk.com>
CC: W <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>

Andy Budd wrote:
> I'm personally interested in how the WAI guidelines were derived. Are 
> they a result of comprehensive user testing, or simply recommendations 
> from accessibility experts?

I've not been involved in creating the guidelines, however, I can say 
that doing an audit based on the WCAG v1 checkpoints has tallied very to 
usability testing with people of various abilities (e.g. people who use 
screen readers,  screen magnifiers, browser controls and people who are 
deaf, have mild cognitive impairments and/or motor difficulty.)

Although the weighting was a little different (testing showed more of 
the 'usability' aspects of the WCAG, e.g. consistent navigation and 
plain English aspects), the overall correlated well.

It has to be said that using the WCAG (v1) checkpoints to audit a site 
takes some experience both in web development and in the technologies 
people use to access sites.

Kind regards,



Alastair Campbell   |   Director of Technology

Please refer to the following disclaimer for this message:
Received on Monday, 23 August 2004 12:05:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:21:29 UTC