W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > July to September 2004

Re: The Problem with WCAG (was RE: CSS Techniques for WCAG 2.0)

From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 17:50:12 +0100
Message-ID: <41262BC4.5050206@splintered.co.uk>
To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org

Kurt_Mattes@bankone.com wrote:

> I fully understand the desire for simplified language - benefits go 
> beyond accessibility for people with disabilities
> However, there is the law of many countries that require certain 
> agreements to be written with specific language

That's why in WCAG1.0 it says
"14.1 Use the clearest and simplest language appropriate for a site's 
Notice the last part of that sentence.

If there is a legal requirement for certain ways of wording things, then 
of course it would not be appropriate to simplify it further.

re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]
www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
Received on Friday, 20 August 2004 16:49:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:21:29 UTC