> John Foliot wrote: > The WAI, WCAG, etc. is concerned about making *HTML based > content* universally accessible. Period. John, can you clarify a bit here? I'm not 100% certain whether you are suggesting that WAI/WCAG are currently just concerned with HTML-based content or if they _should_ only be concerned with doing this. Accessible or not yet, there is more to the web than HTML. If someone develops "foo", a large portion of the computer world goes along with it despite accessibility issues, and HTML falls to the wayside, the WAI/WCAG needs to be there. I don't want to misrepresent your opinion so I'm asking what you meant, but I'd have a hard time agreeing with an HTML-only WCAG/WAI. AWK -- Andrew Kirkpatrick Project Manager, WGBH National Center for Accessible Media 125 Western Ave. Boston, MA 02134 617-300-4420 (direct voice/FAX) 617-300-3400 (main NCAM) 617-300-2489 (TTY)Received on Thursday, 19 August 2004 15:52:20 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:14:17 GMT