W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > July to September 2004

Re: The Problem with WCAG (was RE: CSS Techniques for WCAG 2.0)

From: david poehlman <david.poehlman@handsontechnologeyes.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 09:58:16 -0400
Message-ID: <006701c485f4$936c28b0$6401a8c0@DAVIDPC>
To: "RUST Randal" <RRust@COVANSYS.com>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>

It is clear in wcag that it is a set of guidelines.  Anyone who takes it to
be something else is miss informed.  508 was based on the guidelines in part
and many other pollicies are based on them as well.

Johnnie Apple Seed

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "RUST Randal" <RRust@COVANSYS.com>
To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 9:38 AM
Subject: RE: The Problem with WCAG (was RE: CSS Techniques for WCAG 2.0)



david poehlman wrote:

> I know you object to guidelines in general, but
> without them, there would be no guidance for pollicy and
> standards.

Not true. Not true at all, David. I do not object to guidelines. I
object to guidelines that are not understandable and impractical.

If WCAG is just a set of guidelines, then what to you consider to be
standards or policy? Section 508?

----------
Randal Rust
Covansys Corp.
Columbus, OH
Received on Thursday, 19 August 2004 13:57:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 5 February 2014 23:39:44 UTC