Re: [Norton AntiSpam] Re: Accessible web content services.

http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/topic_interest is pretty much deprecated.
http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/interest (described at
http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/#term_interest) is being favoured amongst FOAFsters
although I prefer the former (though it needs to work with another ontology to
describe these interests).

http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/interest works by refering to a page on the web about
the topic in question. This clearly works best for the kind of searches we're
talking about if there is one page which is *the* page for the topic in
question. http://www.w3.org/WAI/ is probably the most suitable choice in this
case.

> 
> Nice to hear you thinking on what I think are sound lines, anyway :-)
> 
> If you add some stuff about "trust" you can find out who trusts a  
> particular accessibility expert, and that way you get to build up a  
> picture without relying on any particular central authority (I might  
> believe thatch, and you might believe joe, but we can trace the relevant  
> networks according to who trusts who and find people that we thin it is  
> reasoanble to trust...)
> 
> I cc'ed tom croucher, because he is doing some work in this area at the  
> moment.
> 
> cheers
> 
> Chaals
> 
> On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 01:20:24 +0100, Patrick H. Lauke  
> <redux@splintered.co.uk> wrote:
> 
> > Just to answer my own question...looking through
> > http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/ i found something
> > similar to what I had in mind: Property: foaf:topic_interest
> > http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/#term_topic_interest
> > So, if I understand it correctly, we could add an interest of
> > "accessibility" and then do a recursive search through FOAF
> > files (starting from a single person, spidering their contacts)
> > and look for those with such an interest specified in their
> > personal description...
> > Again...sorry...just thinking out loud.
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Charles McCathieNevile     charles@sidar.org
> Fundación Sidar             http://www.sidar.org
> 
> 


-- 
Jon Hanna
<http://www.hackcraft.net/>
…it has been truly said that hackers have even more words for
equipment failures than Yiddish has for obnoxious people." - jargon.txt