W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > July to September 2004

RE: [Norton AntiSpam] Re: Accessible web content services.

From: <David.Pawson@rnib.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 08:37:51 +0100
Message-ID: <9B66BBD37D5DD411B8CE00508B69700F06FFE10E@pborolocal.rnib.org.uk>
To: redux@splintered.co.uk, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org

What's the vocabulary we need for rdf? Is it worth starting
a new ontology for this area?

What short phrases adequately capture, via an online source if necessary,
opinions about website designs?

1. HasTripleA. this organisation has designed some number of triple A sites.

2. 508Experience. this organisation has provided 508 compliant designs.
3. reference.   link to a site designed by this organisation for reference.

I can't see why this area isn't worth its own vocabulary?

That's two uses for rdf I've come across in one week. Spooky.

regards DaveP

** snip here **


NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is 
confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended 
recipient you should not use, disclose, distribute or copy any of the 
content of it or of any attachment; you are requested to notify the 
sender immediately of your receipt of the email and then to delete it 
and any attachments from your system. 

RNIB endeavours to ensure that emails and any attachments generated by 
its staff are free from viruses or other contaminants. However, it 
cannot accept any responsibility for any  such which are transmitted.
We therefore recommend you scan all attachments. 

Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email and 
any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily represent 
those of RNIB. 

RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227 

Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk 
Received on Friday, 30 July 2004 03:38:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:21:29 UTC