> > This all said, what bothers me more is what I found on > > http://www.gawds.org/show.php?contentid=58 > > > > What exactly troubles you here? > It has been pointed out to me that perhaps I should have also elaborated more. Guilty as charged. My fast-fingered response was due to the fact that Tina *didn't* point out the problem, only referred to it. That comment about little yellow boxes to check for alt text is just plain stupid... the author clearly is mis-informed or ill-informed, and lacks credibility. Remember however that GAWDS is a volunteer organization, and as such prone to these types of "errors". None-the-less Jim Bryne should be commended for his work in establishing the Guild... we can't always expect him to police everything on the site, although this particular article/opinion piece *SHOULD* be addressed (Jim??). As a member of GAWDS, I must say it reflects poorly on GAWDS and on serious accessibility practitioners in general. JF -- John Foliot foliot@wats.ca Web Accessibility Specialist / Co-founder of WATS.ca Web Accessibility Testing and Services http://www.wats.ca 1.866.932.4878 (North America)Received on Thursday, 29 July 2004 10:55:44 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:14:16 GMT