W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > January to March 2004

RE: [WAI-IG] Top posting. An attempted summary

From: <David.Pawson@rnib.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 13:10:32 -0000
Message-ID: <9B66BBD37D5DD411B8CE00508B69700F049E24A1@pborolocal.rnib.org.uk>
To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org

Just picking up one point from David P.

  I hate >>>>>>>>>>>> or:
    > > > > > > >
    even more since in the first instance, I will hear three at 
    most and in the
    latter I will hear each one because they are spaced.

I think I recall you use Access technology?
So conclusion is that an alternative method of grabbing the who said what
is a desirable improvement?

Or does it matter? Is it enough to comprehend that someone on this thread
said this piece?
What about the semantics of this piece is 3 replies ago, this other one
two replies ago. Is that useful information?

regards DaveP.

** snip here **


NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is 
confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended 
recipient you should not use, disclose, distribute or copy any of the 
content of it or of any attachment; you are requested to notify the 
sender immediately of your receipt of the email and then to delete it 
and any attachments from your system. 

RNIB endeavours to ensure that emails and any attachments generated by 
its staff are free from viruses or other contaminants. However, it 
cannot accept any responsibility for any  such which are transmitted.
We therefore recommend you scan all attachments. 

Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email and 
any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily represent 
those of RNIB. 

RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227 

Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk 
Received on Monday, 1 March 2004 08:10:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:21:27 UTC