W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > April to June 2004

Re: ClickZ network article

From: Steven Dale <sdale@stevendale.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 03:23:21 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <1864.68.232.131.110.1086679401.squirrel@www.stevendale.com>
To: <lois@lois.co.uk>
Cc: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>

>> Seek out usability experts, and request guidance from national
>> disability institutions, especially those representing the blind and
>> partially sighted
>
>  - why the latter qualification?
>

Because, and is evidanced here many times, accessibility = screen readers.

Why, is this?  Do we send the wrong message by using screen readers as the
first, and many times, only example of why pages may be inaccessible?

=Steve
Received on Tuesday, 8 June 2004 03:23:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 5 February 2014 07:13:33 UTC