W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > April to June 2004

Re: fixed font size.

From: Julia Collins <julia@we3.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2004 08:35:09 -0700
To: <David.Pawson@rnib.org.uk>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BC981C3D.4EFB%julia@we3.co.uk>


as far as I can see, the font is re-sizable and no size declaration on the
body (perhaps he took your advice?). The problem is the non-fluid, fixed
width layout that contains the site - so if text is resized, there are
overflows which make it harder, not easier, to read.

Also, the lists used for navs still have indents on them which looks really
messy on a resize (and a bit iffy on 100%), and a fixed line height..


On 6/4/04 12:23 am, "David.Pawson@rnib.org.uk" <David.Pawson@rnib.org.uk>

> The site http://www.pilot-link.org/
> is using an external css file in which the font size is fixed.
> When I mailed him, he seemed confident that his was a good site,
> asking for feedback.
> In the css file he has
> body {
> font-size:        10px;
> font-family:        verdana, helvetica, sans-serif;
> }
> I.e. he's fixed everything at 10 pixels font size, which I find
> uncomfortably small.
> Quite rigid, doesn't allow me to increase it for my own needs.
> I think with IE6 on board, the only way I can overcome his
> font size is by using my own CSS in the cascade?
> How can I persuade him that its not a good idea please?
> Regards DaveP.
> **** snip here *****
> - 
> NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is
> confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended
> recipient you should not use, disclose, distribute or copy any of the
> content of it or of any attachment; you are requested to notify the
> sender immediately of your receipt of the email and then to delete it
> and any attachments from your system.
> RNIB endeavours to ensure that emails and any attachments generated by
> its staff are free from viruses or other contaminants. However, it
> cannot accept any responsibility for any  such which are transmitted.
> We therefore recommend you scan all attachments.
> Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email and
> any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
> those of RNIB. 
> RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227
> Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk
Received on Tuesday, 6 April 2004 03:40:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:21:28 UTC