W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > October to December 2003

RE: Using Frames - what problems do screen readers have?

From: <Kurt_Mattes@bankone.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 08:56:21 -0500
Message-ID: <B239BEDED044074C8E2CCC3A9162F2A905B487B9@swilnts804.wil.fusa.com>
To: <accessys@smart.net>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>


**********************************************************************
This transmission may contain information that is privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the information contained herein (including any reliance thereon) is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you received this transmission in error, please immediately contact the sender and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy format. Thank you
**********************************************************************

Is this to say that a site is not accessible and/or does not comply with W3C/508 if it cannot be read by EMACSPEAK running on a LYNX system?
 
Why wouldn't a site that provides the same user interaction as a Netscape or IE browser and is readable by Jaws and W-E be considered accessible?
 
Kurt 

	-----Original Message----- 
	From: Access Systems [mailto:accessys@smart.net] 
	Sent: Tue 11/18/2003 8:38 AM 
	To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org 
	Cc: 
	Subject: Re: Using Frames - what problems do screen readers have?
	
	


	On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, Julian Voelcker wrote:
	
	> > and say what you like, frames do slow a
	> > page down as the server rushes about it's hard drive building the pages when
	> > requested to do so. And the more you add the longer the process gets.
	>
	> Initially they will be slow to load, but if well implemented once they are 
	> loaded they are a lot quicker to use because you are only loading elements of
	> a page as opposed to the whole page, which is particularly attractive when
	> dealing with a very 'feature rich' environment like an on line application.
	
	but the real question is "does the frame and feature rich
	environment" actually add real usefulness to the site??? or are they just
	"eye candy"
	 >
	> > Most disabled people in the world that access the internet do not have Jaws,
	> > most disabled people in the world that access the internet do not have super
	> > fast state of the art computers.
	>
	> Fortunately we know that the disabled people who would be using the system
	> would be using screen reader software and hardware that is never likely to be
	> more than two years old.
	
	how do you know this??
	my computer is just updated with the latest P-IV and super fast etc etc
	etc, but won't work worth beans on frames,  why because I still like and
	use LYNX for surfing the web.   not to mention it runs the latest version
	of Linux and the screen reader software is EMACSPEAK
	
	REMEMBER NOT EVERYONE USES THE GARBAGE FROM REDMOND, and basing your site
	on M$ software is NOT accessible or usable and does not comply with W3C or
	508.
	
	Bob
	
	
	"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
	safety deserve Neither liberty nor safety",    Benjamin Franklin
	-   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -
	   ASCII Ribbon Campaign                        accessBob                      
	    NO HTML/PDF/RTF in e-mail                   accessys@smartnospam.net      
	    NO MSWord docs in e-mail                    Access Systems, engineers      
	    NO attachments in e-mail,  *LINUX powered*   access is a civil right
	*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#
	THIS message and any attachments are CONFIDENTIAL and may be
	privileged.  They are intended ONLY for the individual or entity named
	
	
	

Received on Tuesday, 18 November 2003 08:56:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:14:13 GMT