- From: Tom Croucher <tcroucher@netalleynetworks.com>
- Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2003 11:05:14 +0100 (BST)
- To: <P.H.Lauke@salford.ac.uk>
- Cc: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
That sounds acceptable, although presumabley at some point there will be a need for lagnuage packs or unicode to be available to serve up content that would be unmaintainable. I think it is important that there is a distinction between use of images to ensure that users can always see the text, and appropriate use of images to provide content. Tom > >> My own feeling is >> that using images is generally not a good step and that it >> would quickly become unmaintainable. > > However, getting back to the original discussion (native text > as opposed to flags to denote different language versions), > I would say that having a handful of images will not be such > a huge maintenance job. Once users then choose a specific language, the > page should of course contain unicode-encoded text, not graphics. > > Patrick > ________________________________ > Patrick H. Lauke > Webmaster / University of Salford > http://www.salford.ac.uk
Received on Thursday, 2 October 2003 06:05:36 UTC