W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > July to September 2003

Re: a word for 'accessible', that people get.

From: Andy Heath <a.k.heath@shu.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 11:12:41 +0100
Message-ID: <3F210299.9020509@shu.ac.uk>
To: "'w3c-wai-ig@w3.org'" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>

Why have a label at all?

For example, speaking from a UK perspective, what
about older people - surely having different options
benefits everyone doesn't it ?  I think using the categories
is starting from the wrong place.  There is repressed
demand I think (people choose from only standard
products as you point out).

ok, maybe that doesn't solve your problem.

andy

> Hi,
> 
> I am doing some work for a large UK company that sells a range of
> 'accessible' products alongside its standard product range.  They are
> currently under the category of 'accessible products' - BUT in user testing
> when looking for accessible products NOBODY look in this category!
> 'Accessible' is a great word for people in the industry, but currently it
> doesn't mean a great deal to anyone else.
> 
> Can anyone suggest another term?  We tried 'special needs' but the client
> isn't happy with that because the phrase has negative connotations in the
> UK.
> 
> 	Many thanks,
> 
> 		Dr. Mischa Weiss-Lijn
> 
> 
> 
> _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
> Internet communications are not secure and therefore Oyster Partners Ltd does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Oyster Partners Ltd.
> 
> 


-- 
andy
_______________________________________________
Andy Heath
Sheffield Hallam University
andy@andyheath.org.uk
Received on Friday, 25 July 2003 06:40:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:14:10 GMT