W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > July to September 2003

RE: a word for 'accessible', that people get.

From: Mischa Weiss-Lijn <Mischa.Weiss-Lijn@oyster.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 10:36:58 +0100
Message-ID: <7165D5A55FC4D41184DB00D0B7B9E62D07957377@mail.oyster.co.uk>
To: "'w3c-wai-ig@w3.org'" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>

I don't think the suppliers of products that don't fit into the 'user
friendly' (i.e. accessible) category, would be very happy about that.

        :) mischa

-----Original Message-----
From: Lauke PH [mailto:P.H.Lauke@salford.ac.uk]
Sent: 25 July 2003 10:34
To: Mischa Weiss-Lijn; w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Subject: RE: a word for 'accessible', that people get.

In that case...how about 'user-friendly' ?

Patrick
________________________________
Patrick H. Lauke
Webmaster / University of Salford
http://www.salford.ac.uk

> The products are mainly telecoms related appliances, such as
> big button
> telephones and large high contrast displays for telephones
> (to show who is
> calling).

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Internet communications are not secure and therefore Oyster Partners Ltd does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Oyster Partners Ltd.
Received on Friday, 25 July 2003 06:06:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:14:10 GMT