W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > July to September 2003

Re: Metadata and Checkpoint 13.2

From: Liddy Nevile <Liddy.Nevile@motile.net>
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2003 21:53:43 +1000
Cc: andy@andyheath.org.uk, WAI Interest Group <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
To: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@sidar.org>
Message-Id: <A9FDE8FE-ABBA-11D7-8113-0003936DC022@motile.net>

so what else? please explain.

I have already noted that I agree with everyone talking about 
navigation and that it is good to have metadata that describes links 
etc but that is not the sort of metadata I was worrying about .... 
should I be?

Liddy


On Tuesday, July 1, 2003, at 06:49  PM, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:

> Well, I like it as far as it goes. It seems the scope is a little 
> different - it covers what should be added to common DC practice, and 
> I like what it says.
>
> I think there are some additional things that are useful in 
> Accessibility - some of the things that are already common in the 
> Dublin Core community and possibly some that are more strongly tied to 
> the fact that things are on the Web (As I understand it, Dublin Core 
> is meant to be usable for things that are not on the Web, so those 
> things won't fit into DC easily as far as I can tell).
>
> cheers
>
> Chaals
>
> On Tuesday, Jul 1, 2003, at 02:24 Europe/Zurich, Liddy Nevile wrote:
>
>>
>> Can I expose my thinking and see how people react to it?
>>
>> It is set out briefly at http://www.ozewai.org/liddy/20030701.html
>>
>> Liddy
>>
>>
> --
> Charles McCathieNevile                          Fundación Sidar
> charles@sidar.org                                http://www.sidar.org
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 1 July 2003 07:53:49 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:14:10 GMT