> In today's letigeous society, it is sad that it is possible even > though all > that can be done has been done that an entity can still be sued > for lack of > accessibility or in any case, compliance with someone's idea of > accessibility even though the site is accessible. How could a court set damages if no damage was done?Received on Monday, 24 March 2003 11:11:57 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 20 September 2007 14:03:45 GMT