W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > January to March 2003

Re: WthRemix finalists announced

From: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 07:17:13 +0000 (GMT)
Message-Id: <200303110717.h2B7HEC00574@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org

> 
> 
> Back in the day, I wrote:
> 
> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ig/2002OctDec/0738.html>

The third one uses <br><br> to simulate <p> (that was an obvious bug from
the Lynx rendering - most GUI browsers interpret br wrongly, so that
multiple br's simulate margins) and attempts to set caching attributes
using meta (proxies ignore content).  I don't believe the meta copyright
statement - it's got to be a derivative work of the original, surely.

<div>&#32;</div> 

is a new presentational hack on me.  Are there any SGML experts who
can tell me whether this bypasses the ignore white space rule?  At
least with &#160; you know you have a non-whitespace character.

I'd question a statement that the content language was "EN,EN-GB,EN-US".

In my view, Revisit-After should be no more than the cache max-age, but
but they attempt to make the latter zero.  If it's going to be stable for
humans for 7 days, it will be for robots - it's not as though they have
an ad rotator for the humans, but not the robots.  I think they have used
their standard meta setup, not that I think that setup is a good setup.

I'm ignoring the volunteered information that it doesn't work on 
Mozilla.
Received on Tuesday, 11 March 2003 02:45:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:14:08 GMT