- From: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2003 10:45:04 +0000 (GMT)
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
> example 1: form entry field should contain a default > text. that's not always practical and in my own > experience with user tests can confuse users. I've always wondered why people feel the need to do this. This is not an accessibility ghetto thing; it is something that was introduced in mainstream web pages, but not done in the Visual Basic applications which the design is trying to emulate. > example 2: for purely decorative images it has become > general practise to use empty alt attributes. that is > just to satisfy bobby and wai. how is that more > accessible than a missing alt attribute? A missing alt makes the HTML invalid. I think the idea was that requiring the attribute would make people think about it, but, of course, people just use authoring tools that insert alt="", alt="<value of src attribute>", etc., or don't validate anyway. > > example 3: links should be separated by printable > characters (this is one of the 'until user agents...' > points). so web designer often insert the pipe > character and then make it invisible with display:none > in the stylesheet. that adds a lot of wasteful code > to a page. I'm not quite sure of the point, but I would suggest that this process leaves you with an accessibility/usabiliity problem, unfixed. I.E. it is hiding the problem from the checker without removing it.
Received on Saturday, 8 March 2003 05:45:08 UTC