W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > January to March 2003

Re: Is it acceptable to provide two versions of a site to work around an accessibility problem?

From: Access Systems <accessys@smart.net>
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2003 14:23:24 -0500 (EST)
To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0303041422450.12327-100000@smarty.smart.net>

On Tue, 4 Mar 2003, Julian Voelcker wrote:

> OK, so you are suggesting doing the two versions, but rather than use a 'Text 
> Only' link call it something like 'Accessibility version'.
> 
> What's the best wording for it?

"the stupid client made me do it this way"

sorry couldn't resist

Bob


"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve Neither liberty nor safety",    Benjamin Franklin
-   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -
   ASCII Ribbon Campaign                        accessBob                       
    NO HTML/PDF/RTF in e-mail                   accessys@smartnospam.net       
    NO MSWord docs in e-mail                    Access Systems, engineers       
    NO attachments in e-mail,  *LINUX powered*   access is a civil right 
*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#
THIS message and any attachments are CONFIDENTIAL and may be
privileged.  They are intended ONLY for the individual or entity named
Received on Tuesday, 4 March 2003 14:23:23 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:14:08 GMT